सत्य का राजनीतिक निरादर

• Jagran - Yahoo! India - Nazariya News

  tags: no_tag

  

  • 'आहत इतिहास' राष्ट्र अस्मिता को कमजोर करता है। राष्ट्रीय अस्मिता का विस्फोट इतिहास को समृद्ध करता है। 6 दिसंबर 1992 को उत्तार, दक्षिण, पूरब, पश्चिम-पूरा भारत एक था। विंध्य, हिमाचल, यमुना और उच्छल जलधि में ज्वार था। पंजाब, सिंधु, गुजरात, मराठा, द्रविण, उत्कल, बंग अयोध्या में ही थे। परशुराम के केरल से भी जय श्रीराम की यात्राएं चलीं, न कोई राज्य बचा, न कोई क्षेत्र। राष्ट्र जीवमान सत्ता है। व्यक्ति की ही तरह राष्ट्र की भी अपनी अस्मिता होती है। व्यक्ति अपनी अस्मिता अक्सर प्रकट करते रहते हैं, लेकिन राष्ट्र अपनी अस्मिता के प्रकटीकरण में धीरज रखते हैं। भारत ने भी धीरज रखा। श्रीराम भारत का मन हैं, वे भारत की मर्यादा हैं, शील हैं, विनय हैं। राष्ट्र ने लंबी प्रतीक्षा की। सवाल राष्ट्रीय अस्मिता बनाम इस्लामी आक्रामकता का था, बावजूद इसके करोड़ों श्रद्धालुओं को अपमान ही मिला। सहिष्णुता और धीरज की हद होती है।

    6 दिसंबर का ध्वंस सृजन की भावभूमि का मंगल आचरण था। भारत का अवनि अंबर आनंदमगन था। आहत इतिहास को सात्वना मिली, श्रीराम मंदिर अब राष्ट्रीय अपरिहार्यता है। श्रीराम मंदिर के सवाल को ठंडे बस्ते में नहीं डाला जा सकता। यह मसला राजनीतिक नहीं है। सवाल विदेशी इस्लामी आक्रामकता बनाम राष्ट्रीय अस्मिता का है। बाबर और बाबरी मस्जिद विदेशी आक्रामकता के पर्याय हैं। कनिंघम ने दर्ज किया, ''अयोध्या में श्रीराम जन्मभूमि मंदिर तोड़े जाते समय हिंदुओं ने जान की बाजी लगा दी। इस लड़ाई में 1 लाख 74 हजार हिंदुओं की लाशें गिर जाने के बाद ही मीर बाकी तोपों के जरिए मंदिर को क्षति पहुंचा सका।'' यह लड़ाई लगातार चली। आईने अकबरी कहती है कि अयोध्या में राम जन्मभूमि की वापसी के लिए हिंदुओं ने 20 हमले किए। आलमगीरनामा में जिक्र है, ''रमजान की सातवीं तारीख को शाही फौज ने फिर अयोध्या की जन्मभूमि पर हमला किया। 10 हजार हिंदू मारे गए।'' लिब्रहान ने अपनी भीमकाय रिपोर्ट में यह कथानक नहीं लिखा। भारतीय इतिहास की शुरुआत बाबरी मस्जिद से ही नहीं होती।

  • मिर्जाजान अपनी किताब 'हदीकाए शहदा' में कहते हैं, ''सुलतानों ने इस्लाम के प्रचार और प्रतिष्ठा की हौसला अफजाई की। कुफ्र को कुचला। फैजाबाद और अवध को कुफ्र से छुटकारा दिलाया। जिस स्थान पर मंदिर था वहा बाबर ने एक सरबलंद मस्जिद बनाई। मौलवी अब्दुल करीम ने 'गुमगश्ते हालाते अयोध्या अवध' में बताया कि राम के जन्मस्थान व रसोई घर की जगह बाबर ने एक अजीम मस्जिद बनवाई। यही मौलवी उस जमाने में कथित बाबरी मस्जिद के इमाम थे। कमालुद्दीन हुसनी अल हुसैनी अल मशाहदी ने 'कैसरूल तवारीख' में यही बातें कहीं।
  • विलियम फोस्टर की लंदन से प्रकाशित किताब 'अर्ली ट्रेवेल्स इन इंडिया' में यूरोपीय यात्री फिंच के अनुसार मान्यता है कि यहा राम ने जन्म लिया। आस्ट्रिया के टाइफेंथेलर 1766 से 1771 तक अवध रहे। वह लिखते हैं कि बाबर ने राम मंदिर को ध्वस्त किया। इसी के स्तंभों का प्रयोग करके मस्जिद बनाई। ब्रिटिश सर्वेक्षणकर्ता (1838) मोंट गुमरी मार्टिन के अनुसार मस्जिद में इस्तेमाल स्तंभ राम के महल से लिए गए।
  • एनसाइक्लोपीडिया ब्रिटेनिका में भी सन् 1528 से पूर्व बने एक मंदिर का हवाला है। एडवर्ड थार्नटन के अध्ययन के अनुसार बाबरी मस्जिद पुराने हिंदू मंदिर के 14 खंभों से बनी। बाल्फोट के मुताबिक अयोध्या की तीन मस्जिदें तीन हिंदू मंदिरों पर बनीं। पी. कार्नेगी 'हिस्टारिकल स्केच आफ फैजाबाद विद द ओल्ड कैपिटल्स अयोध्या एंड फैजाबाद' में मंदिर की सामग्री से बाबर द्वारा मस्जिद निर्माण का वर्णन करते हैं। गजेटियर आफ दि प्राविंस आफ अवध में भी यही तथ्य हैं। फैजाबाद सेटेलमेंट रिपोर्ट (1880) में भी यही तथ्य हैं। इंपीरियल गजेटियर आफ फैजाबाद (1881) में भी यही है। बाराबंकी डिस्ट्रिक्ट गजेटियर (1902) में बाबर द्वारा जन्मस्थान मंदिर को गिराकर मस्जिद बनाने का वर्णन है। यही बात फैजाबाद डिस्ट्रिक गजेटियर (1905) में व रिवाइज्ड फैजाबाद डिस्ट्रिकट गजेटियर (1960) में भी है। आत्मसमर्पण बड़ी कसक देता है। कैलाश पर चीन का कब्जा है। अयोध्या के श्रीराम मंदिर पर बाबरी की नेमप्लेट। मथुरा, काशी और सोमनाथ पर औरंगजेब, लोदी और गजनवी की मिल्कियत। भारत कैसे जिए? प्रतिपल अपमान, प्रतिक्षण कसक, बहुसंख्यक समाज पर अल्पसंख्यकवाद की दबंगई, अपने ही देश में अपनी ही बेइज्जती।
  • [हृदयनारायण दीक्षित : लेखक उप्र सरकार के पूर्व मंत्री हैं]

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

शंख बजाया तो जेलयात्रा का चांस!-उत्तर-भारत-Navbharat Times

• शंख बजाया तो जेलयात्रा का चांस!-उत्तर-भारत-Navbharat Times

  tags: no_tag

  • कुरुक्षेत्र
  • कुरुक्षेत्र उत्सव गीता जयंती समारोह के दौरान ब्रह्मसरोवर तट पर लगाए गए दो स्टॉलों का शंख और कौड़िय ों बेचने के आरोप में चालान कर दिया गया। स्टॉल में रखे शंख और कौड़ियों भी जब्त कर ली गईं। वन्य जीव प्राणी विभाग के निरीक्षक ने बताया कि वाइल्ड लाइफ ऐक्ट 1972 समूचे देश में लागू है, जिसके तहत शंख और कौड़ियों की बिक्री गैरकानूनी है।
  • प्रदेश में वन्य जीव प्राणी विभाग के अधिकारियों का कहना है कि मंदिरों और घरों में शंख रखने के लिए विभाग से प्रमाणपत्र लेना जरूरी है। जो दुकानदार इनकी बिक्री करेंगे, उनको विभाग से लाइसेंस लेना जरूरी है। लाइसेंस के बिना शंख बेचना गैरकानूनी माना जाएगा।
  • वयोवृद्ध संत महंत गंगा पुरी, षडदर्शन साधु समाज के सचिव और श्री दक्षिणा काली पीठ के महंत बंसीपुरी, संगमेश्वर सेवाधाम के महंत बासुदेव गिरी लाल बाबा और दामोदर गिरी आदि संतों ने शंख बजाने या रखने पर पाबंदी को सनातन संस्कृति पर हमला बताया है।

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Babri to Mumbai attack: One conspiracy Dr Pravin Togadia

• Organiser - Content

  tags: no_tag

  • Babri to Mumbai attack: One conspiracy
    Dr Pravin Togadia
  • Even today, Hindu faith has not withered away as a few pseudo-seculars love to believe. Hindu faith is not Mao’s state that "would wither away". Hindu faith is a constant flow like Ganga Maa going on for ages even before the English language (in which secularism word is written!) was born, even before Islam came into existence and even before Mao’s "to be withered away state" was born. So, 99 per cent of the people whom we meet have this continuous faith in their minds. Expression may differ. Remaining one per cent is a cynical lot-perhaps the most confused lot. They do not come from various walks of life. They are shrunk into some so-called chatter box professions and some of them are typical socialites with a peculiar shrill voice. This one loves the fashion to question all that is Hindu and glorify all that is non-Hindu. Meaning, when Babri falls, this one per cent cries, "Oh, heritage fell!" But when many Hindu temples in Mysore are broken by Babri claimant types (not in the history, but broken in 2009!), this one per cent maintains conspicuous silence. Then they do not recall the word "heritage" or "respect for other’s religion", etc.
  • This one per cent even damns 99 per cent who fold their hands in faith as: ‘‘You old fool! You are not modern moderate. You live in the history and you are taking Bharat backwards." When this 99 per cent craves for building a magnificent Sri Ram Temple in Ayodhya, this one per cent yells from the chatter boxes and from the commissioned reports, "Ram is not important today. Roti is important." This one per cent even has the audacity to blame 99 per cent faithful Hindus for the terror attacks on Bharat. Their fuzzy logic is: "Because Babri was demolished and because in Gujarat Hindus reacted, the terror attacks in and on Bharat have started." While saying it, this one per cent exhibit their own short memory and lack of homework. They conveniently hide that in 1947-48 when Hindus were massacred, Babri was still standing there. In 1990 when Hindu Kashmiri Pundits were butchered and made to be victims of ethnic cleansing in Kashmir by Babri-builder types, Babri was still standing there.
  • The unfortunate part is that, it requires a Kasab to be caught and it requires a convert David Headlely alias Dawud Gilani to be exposed for the vast nation like Bharat to sit up and finally look at the truth that "This is a grand large plan to spread Islam by breaking systems, cracking economies and terrorising all those who are not like them." Same model was used when in 712 Mohammad Bin Kasim entered Sindh and broke a huge Hindu temple in the then Karachi which was in Bharat. Then the series of such invasions and breaking temples, occupying lands, converting /killing people started and then the culmination of it was around 400 years of rule on most of Bharat. Gazni kept on coming into Bharat again and again for 20 years before he finally broke Somnath. That happened on the Gujarat coast. When we say this, the pseudo-seculars shout, "History history! Live in the present. Speak of SEZs, FDIs." In November 2008 when Kasab and his jehadi gang entered Bharat from the Gujarat coast, it was history repeated. This time they did not stop so short at Somnath but could come right up to the commercial heart of Bharat and attacked the proud commercial symbols and lifelines of Bharat like the star hotels, hospitals and railway stations in Mumbai. This is the point. Their invasions and attacks have not stopped since 718. They always have attacked the symbols of Bharat’s faith and prosperity. Then it was rich and crowded temples, now it is financial temples like BSE in 1993 and hotels/hospitals/railways in 2007, 2009 and even before that. Same method. Same goal, modern targets, modern weapons.
  • After electronic and financial inventions in the modern era, all that has changed are the methods, not the goal. First it was a long journey on camels and horses that they then undertook and today they use faster planes, fraudulently made passports and fake currencies to enter and invade. So, those who ignore this dangerous pattern and vicious goal thinking that it is just some imaginary outburst of some people like us, then they are in for a rude shock. They got that shock during the Mumbai attack. The tragic part is that in spite of so many people’s sacrifice in Mumbai, so much economic loss in Mumbai and such a deep trauma in Mumbai, this one per cent are turning a blind eye to the pattern that has emerged historically and is existing and fast spreading like an epidemic even today.
  • Those who had then broken Sri Ram Temple and Somnath Temple, the same people today, by breaking stock markets, business establishments, railway stations and hospitals, are trying to re-establish their rule on Bharat and are snatching roti and living of Bharat. We all know how many died in many jehadi attacks past many years. Due to closure of many business establishments during the Mumbai attack many lost their income. Those who yell, "No Ram, speak roti", must now open their eyes and brains wide and see that Ram and roti are not either or; they are the part of the same one Bharat for 99 per cent. We salute those who bravely fought the jehadis in Mumbai and caught Kasab and got this larger invaders’ conspiracy exposed the same way we salute Kothari brothers and others who sacrificed their lives at Ayodhya. We appreciate those abroad who finally caught Headley and exposed an even larger global jehadi conspiracy. The entire world is alert and aware of the goal of these invaders who started then by breaking worship places as symbols and now break financial symbols.
  • (The writer is a renowned cancer surgeon and secretary general of VHP. He can be contacted at drtogadia@gmail.com)

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Full text of the press statement issued by VHP president Shri Ashok Singhal

• Organiser - Content

  tags: no_tag

  • Ready for any sacrifice for Ram Temple, but demolition was not planned
    
    Full text of the press statement issued by VHP president Shri Ashok Singhal in New Delhi on November 27.
  • It has been substantiated and demonstrated on the basis of Ground Penetrating Radar Survey (GPRS) and archaeological excavations that a pre-existing grand Hindu temple was in evidence at the site before 1528 CE which the jehadi megalomaniac invader Babur got demolished and then got superimposed with a structure symbolising slavery and humiliation of the indigenous culture. He did not choose to go in for a virgin land, but in accordance with the jehadi policy, targeted the birthplace of our national hero and cultural icon. The so-called Babari structure was, therefore, nothing but a political statement by an invader. The Hindu society never accepted this symbol of disgrace and in order to reclaim its religio-cultural freedom went into battle 76 times since to liberate Sri Ramjanmabhoomi and lakhs of our compatriots became martyrs.
  • The Hindus lodged a case in 1950. The case of the Muslim Waqf Board was lodged in 1962. The case ran for 40 years in the district court. It has been going on for 20 years now in the High Court. But still nowhere appears to be the end of the tunnel. Lifetimes of delay in solving this single case is a classic case of justice delayed is justice denied. Even today the case is being unduly dragged for vested interests. The delay being made by the government under the pretext of the matter being subjudice is again creating annoyance, anger and frustration in the national society. The Hindu society is tolerant, but patience also has its limits.
    
    The passing of a High Court judgement was scheduled prior to December 6, 1992 in the case concerning the 2.77 acres of surrounding land, excluding Sri Ramjanmabhoomi, acquired by the Uttar Pradesh government in 1991. Justice Raza-one of the members of the three-member bench of Hon’ble High Court-kept his judgement reserved and in abeyance. This act provoked the lakhs of karsevaks present at that time in Ayodhya and the spontaneous reaction of the pent-up feelings saw the December 6 events happening. It is a moot question as to whose conspiracy it was to have the judgement reserved? Was it possible to do so without a nod from the then central government?
  • We appeal to the Venerable Sants to remain ready to offer leadership to the movement. We appeal to the youth to remain ready for struggles and sacrifices. We would counsel the political parties to declare to trash the Liberhan Commission report and pave the way for re-construction of a grand temple at Sri Ramjanmabhoomi by a law of Parliament, otherwise the Hindu society would be compelled to recommence a huge nationwide movement after a decision to this effect is taken at the forthcoming Haridwar Purna Kumbha.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Liberhan Report vindicates VHP contention

• Organiser - Content

  tags: no_tag

  • Liberhan Report vindicates VHP contention
    Temple was destroyed to build the Babri structure
    A threadbare analysis of the Report by VHP experts

    "...It is noteworthy that no member of the Muslim community from Ayodhya was a member of the Babri Masjid Action Committee or other committee protesting the opening of locks at the disputed structure. Sultan Shahabuddin Owaisi, a Member of Parliament from Hyderabad, challenged the opening of locks along with some others, became a forerunner for taking on the Hindu, organisation."
    
    "Although, there was no order restraining the Muslims from going to the disputed structure or from offering namaz therein either by the judiciary or from the administration, yet namaz was not offered at the disputed structure since 1934. No processions were taken out inside the disputed structure nor any grave dug thereabout."

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.