Rajiv Dixit tells Real History of War of Plasi

• Rajiv Dixit tells Real History of War of Plasi

  tags: no_tag

  • TODAY INDIA HAS THOUSANDS OF “MEER JAAFER” WHO CAN SELL THEIR COUNTRY FOR THEIR PROFIT!
    
    MEER JAAFER was the man responsible for brutal killing of 18000 Indian soldiers at fort William and SIRAJUDAULA (navab of Bengal 1757) with the help of ROBERT CLIVE (army chief of east India Company).
    
    This instance happened in 1757 “WAR OF PLASI” between east India Company and king of Bengal . Sirajudaula, the king of Bengal knew that this company came to conquer India and not for business so he started to revolt.Meer Jaafer was army chief of Bengal, Jaafer betray his own king because of his urge to become king of Bengal .
    
    WAR OF PLASI 23june, 1757 – 18000 Indian soldiers surrendered in front of
    
    300 English soldiers in “40 MINUITES” only. Our 18000 soldiers were kept hungry for 10 days and killed on 11thday at fort William , Bengal .
    
    If Meer Jaafer hadn’t betrayed sirajudaula we might not have lost our 6lacs freedom fighters!
    
    Above text is available at INDIA HOUSE LIBERARY, London.This lib. Have 20000 documents related to Indian slavery.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Veer Savarkar

• Veer Savarkar

  tags: no_tag

  • Oh Motherland,
    Sacrifice for you is like life!
    Living without you is death!!
    - Veer Savarkar, the ideal form of Warrior energy

    
    
  

  • Veer Savarkar - A legend

    • The first political leader to daringly set 'Absolute Political Independence' as Bharat's goal.
    • The first Bharatiya political leader to courageously conduct a bonfire of foreign-made clothes.
    • The first Bharatiya to organise a revolutionary movement for Bharat's Independence at an international level.
    • The first graduate, whose degree was withdrawn by an Bharatiya University for striving for Bharat's Independence.
    • The first political prisoner in the world who was sentenced to life-imprisonment twice, a sentence unparalleled in the history of the British Empire.
  • Jay Hindu Rashtra!

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

2 NATION THEORY - who talked first Veer Savarkar or Syed Ahmed Khan - response to article in Dawn - Audarya Fellowship

• 2 NATION THEORY - who talked first Veer Savarkar or Syed Ahmed Khan - response to article in Dawn - Audarya Fellowship

  tags: no_tag

  • one of the myths perpetuated by the Dawn article below and secularists in India
    is that V D Savarkar was amongst others the first to talk about the 2 nation
    theory. After the Mutiny of 1857 when the Muslims & Hindus fought the British
    together the Brits came down heavily on the Muslims. Starting 1860's Sir Syed
    Ahmed Khan founder of the Aligarh Muslim University and the Brits worked
    together hand in hand and laid the seeds of Muslims separatism. This was to
    culminate in the Creation of separate electorates for Muslims around 1906 and
    the Partition of Bengal in 1905. These decisions were meant to accentuate the
    Hindu Muslim divide. Please read Syed Ahmed's speeches and the role played by
    the Brits in an article titled 'Aligarh Muslim Movement and British role' on
    esamskriti link below.
    http://www.esamskriti.com/html/new_i...cid=412&sid=99,
    Find below two of his speeches that will give yu an idea of what I am saying.
    
    1. At a speech at Meerut on 16/03/1888 Syed Ahmed refers to the Hindus and
    Muslims not only as two nations, but as two warring nations who could not lead
    a common political life if ever the Brits left India. He said, "Now suppose
    that all the Brits were to leave India, then who would be the rulers of India?
    Is it possible that under these circumstances these nations, the Muhammadan and
    the Hindu could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power. Most certainly
    not. It is necessary that one of them should conquer the other and thrust it
    down. To hope that both could remain equal is to desire the impossible and the
    inconceivable". Sachin Sen pg 42. Extract from History and Culture of the
    Indian People by the Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan.
    
    2. Quoting from Indian Controversies by Arun Shourie pg 112 Syed Ahmed said "And
    first suppose that all the Muslims vote for a Muslim and all the Hindus vote for
    a Hindu, it is certain that Muslims will have four times as many votes since
    their population is four times as numerous. And then how can the Muslim guard
    his interests? Now I ask you, O Muslims! Weep at your condition! Have you such
    wealth that you can compete with the Hindus? In the whole nation there is no
    person who is equal to Hindus in the fitness for the work!" Will the Hindus
    stop criticizing themselves?
    
  • It should be worthwhile to examine these statements
    closely and put them to a test of facts.The first man to talk of Hindus and
    Muslims as separate nations was V.D. Savarkar who coined the word 'Hindutva' in
    a book with the same title in 1923. Other Hindu leaders who accepted the
    two-nation theory were Dr Moonje of the Hindu Mahasabha, Pandit Madan Mohan
    Malaviya, founder of the Benares Hindu University, Lala Lajpat Rai, Bhai
    Parmanand and Swami Shraddhanand.
    
    Eminent Bengali writer Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay also supported the notion."
    

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Organiser - Savarkar's untold story

• Organiser - Content

  tags: no_tag

  • Savarkar's untold story
    Interviews with Savarkar film-maker and his son
    By Anil Nair
  • Ved Rahi
  • Ved Rahi is a film-maker whose genre is uncommon. He made a full-length feature film on Savarkar without even the elementary financial backing of a producer. People from all over the country contributed with their small amounts of even Rs 100, which finally helped him make his dream project come true.
  
  • Mahatma Gandhi with Savarkar in the film Savarkar
  
  • Ved Rahi
  • >What about Savarkar countenancing the two-nation theory?
    
    That is another bit of fiction that is doing the rounds. Savarkar?s poems which are so soul-wrenching dealt with nationalism and Akhand Bharat and he unequivocally rejected the two-nation theory. It is amusing to see that a person like Mahatma Gandhi who all his life swore that partition of the country will be over his dead body, finally gave in. But today politicians attribute the two-nation theory to people like Savarkar who were staunchly against it. Very funny.
    

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• Vinayak Damodar Savarkar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  tags: no_tag

  • [edit] Opposition to the partition of India

    The Muslim League adopted the Lahore Resolution in 1940, calling for a separate Muslim state based on the Two-Nation Theory, Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar summaries Savarkar's position, in his Pakistan or The Partition of India as follows,

    “

    Mr. Savarkar... insists that, although there are two nations in India, India shall not be divided into two parts, one for Muslims and the other for the Hindus; that the two nations shall dwell in one country and shall live under the mantle of one single constitution;... In the struggle for political power between the two nations the rule of the game which Mr. Savarkar prescribes is to be one man one vote, be the man Hindu or Muslim. In his scheme a Muslim is to have no advantage which a Hindu does not have. Minority is to be no justification for privilege and majority is to be no ground for penalty. The State will guarantee the Muslims any defined measure of political power in the form of Muslim religion and Muslim culture. But the State will not guarantee secured seats in the Legislature or in the Administration and, if such guarantee is insisted upon by the Muslims, such guaranteed quota is not to exceed their proportion to the general population.[8]

    ”

    Towards the end of the war, Savarkar and the Mahasabha became increasingly confrontational with the League and Muslim politicians. Hindu Mahasabha activists protested Gandhi's initiative to hold talks with Jinnah in 1944, which Savarkar denounced as "appeasement." He assailed the British proposals for transfer of power, attacking both the Congress and the British for making concessions to Muslim separatists. Soon after Independence, Dr Shyama Prasad Mookerjee resigned as Vice-President of the Hindu Mahasabha dissociating himself from its Akhand Hindustan plank, which implied undoing partition.^[9]

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.