Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Buddhism and Vedas — Self-Help | Motivation | Spiritualism | Rationalism | Behavioral Repatterning | Vedas | Hinduism | Anti-Casteism | Women Rights - Agniveer


Buddhism is often considered to be an anti-Vedic atheist philosophy. While today there are huge number of schools and sects within Buddhism (exceeded perhaps only by Islam in terms of number of divisions, sects, sub-sects within), if we review the original teachings of Gautam Buddha, we find that he was only trying to teach the concepts of Vedas to best of his understanding.

Vocabulary of Buddhism

1. The vocabulary of Buddhism is adopted from prevailing literature.

The word Buddha comes in Mahabharat Shantiparva 193/6 to mean ‘intelligent’.

Bodhisatva has been used for Sri Krishna in Shishupal Vadh 15/58 and its commentary by Vallabhdeva.

Bhikshu again is a word denoting certain sage in Mahabharat Shantiparva 325/24 and Gautam Dharmasutra 3/2.

Shraman comes in Brihadaranyak Upanishad and Gautam Dharmasutra

Nirvana comes from Deval Dharmasutra

and so on.

2. The famous Buddhist chant of Om Mani Padme Hum speaks for itself on glory of Om – that originates from Vedas and is integral part of Hinduism.


Vedas in teachings of Mahatma Buddha

3. In Sutta Nipat 192, Mahatma Buddha says that:

Vidwa Cha Vedehi Samechcha Dhammam Na Uchchavacham Gachhati Bhooripanjo.

People allow sense-organs to dominate and keep shuffling between high and low positions. But the scholar who understands Vedas understands Dharma and does not waver.

4. Sutta Nipat 503:

Yo Vedagu Gyanarato Sateema …….

One should support a person who is master of Vedas, contemplative, intelligent, helpful if you desire to inculcate similar traits.

5. Sutta Nipat 1059:

Yam Brahmanam Vedagum Abhijanjya Akinchanam Kamabhave Asattam……

One gets free from worldly pains if he is able to understand a Vedic Scholar who has no wealth and free from attraction towards worldly things.

6. Sutta Nipat 1060:

Vidwa Cha So Vedagu Naro Idha Bhavabhave Sangam Imam Visajja…..

I state that one who understands the Vedas rejects attraction towards the world and becomes free from sins.

7. Sutta Nipat 846:

Na Vedagu Diththia Na Mutiya Sa Manameti Nahi Tanmayoso….

One who knows Vedas does not acquire false ego. He is not affected by hearsay and delusions.

8. Sutta Nipat 458:

Yadantagu Vedagu Yanjakaale Yassahuti Labhe Taras Ijjeti Broomi

I state that one who acquires Ahuti in Havan of a Vedic scholar gets success.

These are just a few examples from works of Mahatma Buddha.


Why Mahatma Buddha rejected Vedas

9. Mahatma Buddha did not reject Vedas per se, but the malpractices happening in name of Vedas. For example, if you call someone – He is a Neta of India – today, he may get offended and feel as if you have called him corrupt and manipulative. This is not because Neta word in itself means ‘corrupt’, but because this is what we see of the so-called Netas today.

Similarly, when Mahatma Buddha questioned birth-based casteism, animal sacrifice and other nonsense practices, he was answered that Vedas sanction so. Thus, like any sane morally upright person would do, Mahatma Buddha stated that: “If Vedas sanction these evil practices, then I reject Vedas.”

Had Gautam Buddha obtained an opportunity to study the actual Vedas and not go by the false notions prevailing, he could no way have issued such a statement.

And the country + entire world would have been strong enough to counter barbaric attacks of West/ Central Asian tribals that has resulted in the greatest problem of last 1000 years – terrorism.

10. If you review the basic precepts of Buddhism, they are simply Vedic teachings reworded.

- For example, the 4 cardinal truths on life, suffering, desire, cessation is straight from Yoga and Nyaya Darshan. In fact Nyaya Darshan 1.2 echoes almost the same essence in as many words.

- The 8 fold path is adequately covered in a variety of ways in all ancient texts – Vedas, Manusmriti, Mahabharat and Yoga Darshan for example.

- The emphasis on Ahimsa is adapted from Yoga Darshan that puts Ahimsa as the first essential discipline for progress in Yoga- the process of realizing self and God.

- Theory of rebirth and Law of Karma that Buddhism is built upon finds its foundation in mantras of Vedas. Refer examples in http://agniveer.com/3203/islam-vedas/

- Rejection of birth-based caste-system is also in lines with Vedas. Refer http://agniveer.com/series/caste-system-3/

- Emphasis on meditation is straight adopted from the Yoga Darshan that itself is based on Vedas.

- The 5 commandments for Buddhists and especially monks are from Yoga Darshan 1.2.3

In summary, one can state that Buddhism, as preached by Gautam Buddha, was a system of morality based on Vedas.


Why was Mahatma Buddha atheist?

11. Mahatma Buddha was not atheist. Atheism developed later. At best, Gautam Buddha can be said to be agnostic. He believed that first and foremost duty is to raise one’s intellect level through practice of moral code of conduct and mind control.

12. Mahatma Buddha did not believe in arguments or debates. He had a very practical approach. He thus refused to either deny or acknowledge presence of God or a supreme entity. He was content with teaching self-control and self-constraint and did not take trouble of attempting a solution of the great problems of Universe: How it began? Is it everlasting? Have I existed in past? Will I exist forever? etc.

Later philosophers of Buddhism did attempt to solve these mysteries through their own analysis and that is how Buddhism developed so many branches and sects.

In Kula Mayukyaovad Majjhama Nikaya there is a reference where someone asked Gautam Buddha whether the world is everlasting. He replied, “Did I ever promise that I shall teach you whether the world is everlasting or not? If not, then do not press the inquiry.”

In Sabbasava Sutta, he suggests that such inquiries into self and universe are meaningless.

Thus Mahatma Buddha focused on practical aspects and neglected the theoretical or metaphysical aspects. This was perhaps because he wanted to ensure that ritualistic malpractices do not overshadow the core essence of his teachings.

However these are natural questions in any human being and thus later Buddhists had to make up for this deficiency in a variety of ways.

But if we review the original philosophy of Mahatma Buddha, there is no evidence of he being atheist or anti-Vedic.

His attitude towards Vedas and Theism was that of indifference rather than rejection. In this indifference lied his Vedic foundation. Because he eventually adopted only from the Vedas to form his ideology and strived to be an honest practitioner of “Accept truth, reject the rest.” to best of his capability and intent.


Impact of Buddhism

13. Buddhism had a great impact during its times. It paved way for rejection of distortions and external symbols towards nurture of morality. Since Buddhism did not challenge any of the key philosophical foundations of existing way of life – rebirth, law of karma, emphasis on morality – it became popular not only in India and across Asia. But soon it declined especially in India.

14. As Mahatma Buddha himself said, “The body contains within itself the power to renew its strength but also the causes that lead to its destruction.”

In case of Buddhism, the cause lied in its incompleteness. While it adopted the moral precepts of Vedas, it ignored the metaphysical foundations. Thus while a whole generation of Buddhist philosophers did spring up later, they could not address the key metaphysical questions convincingly and cohesively – On Self, Universe and Unchangeable Laws. This may work for pragmatics but not for the truly philosophical minds.

A mind tired with illogical ways of life may find great reprieve in focusing purely on moral precepts and meditation. But for someone who hails for a culture having a vast legacy of philosophical richness in every mundane and not-so-mundane aspect of life, there are more questions needed to be explored to quench the intellectual thirst.

Acharya Shankar debated with Buddhists of his era and proved that whatever Buddhism (of that era) argues by denying existence of God can also be explained by Adwait (One singular entity everywhere). Thus for centuries the debate between atheists and Vedics continued giving rise to a vast number of philosophical texts in India.

15. Later Buddhism tried to deny more clearly the existence of God and even that of soul but could not give a satisfactory substitute. They believed in eternal immutable law and never ending chain of cause and effect. But in absence of an entity ensuring that the laws work smartly and for our benefit, it was a blind alley: A religion without a deity! A worshipper without an object of worship!

This forced Buddhists to evolve their own elaborate set of ceremonies, rituals, idols, chants and practices, but this only brought them in rift with the original concepts. Some historians state that idol-worship began with Buddhism. All this kept splitting it into so many branches that are startlingly different at times. The religion supposed to be based on logic, intellect and mind-control, developed loads of superstitions, blind beliefs, tantra practices, witchcraft and myths of miracles. Today the divine Dalai Lama superstition has become foundation of popular Buddhism.

16. The rift widened so much that the religion, which is said to have been based on foundation of Non-Violence or Ahimsa, and which is said to have rejected Vedas because Vedas were perceived to sanction animal-sacrifice, is one of the largest consumers of meat-products today! In many Buddhist places, they hang a board outside meat-shop that says: “Believe Us, This meat is not for you.” Now the monks are guilt-free in eating meat in these shops!!

When someone asked Dalai Lama while he was helping himself with a serving of meat, he said, ” I am Buddhist. I am not vegetarian!”

Ironically, what is taught today across world is that Mahatma Buddha got perturbed when he saw people carrying animals for sacrifice and hence rebelled! Very few people perhaps know that the cult that had its very origin in Animal Rights is the largest killer of animals today! All for taste!

And followers of Vedas – which were alleged to endorse animal killing – are today the greatest proponents of Animal Rights!

In fact, many sects of Buddhism believe that Mahatma Buddha died due to indigestion from consumption of pork offered as charity. (as per these sects whatever provided in charity must be consumed.)

Similarly, while Buddhism (which started with rejecting man-made caste system) is now divided into so many sects/ sub-sects with its own sectoral practices that are necessary to adopt to be one of them, it is followers of Vedas who reject all man-made divisions and appeal for oneness of entire humankind regardless of man-made rituals and beliefs.

The roles are completely reversed today.

Coming back to the roots – Vedas – seems to be the best way to emulate Gautam Buddha today!!

17. While Buddhism could create appeal among other regions and can impress Christians today (Christianity derives its philosophical foundation in Buddhism and hence it is the next logical bridge for Christians to an evolved and more matured view of life), but for India – that has been home to a whole chain of eminent thinkers, the vagueness of Buddhism could not hold its appeal for long.

Today, whatever Buddhism prevails in India is primarily a reaction to the birth-based caste system and related rituals which are wrongly attributed to Vedas.

18. The final blow to Buddhism came from Islamic invasion in medieval era. The Bamiyan Buddhas of Afghanistan are mute spectators of that gory period of history. Buddhism, by its very rejection of other aspects of life except moral precepts, became most vulnerable to Muslim attacks. This has been the greatest damaging gift of Buddhist ideology to present era. The escapist Buddhist view that preferred to be neutral to all that happens with us in world, coupled with a damaging caste-system among Hindus, made sure that barbaric uncivilized tribals could decimate us and establish their dominance. Hinduism could still survive due to its inherent emphasis on realism, but Buddhism perished. And this untimely perish had further adverse outcomes on future of India in the form of philosophical downtime.

19. Ask any weight-trainer and he would tell you that if you need to build big biceps, you need to focus on leg-squats as well. Lop-sided development does not work. It only causes injuries. Similarly mere focus on moral precepts do not work for society. One has to dwell into other aspects – society, politics, science, philosophy, metaphysics, etc – for things to work out. That is why Vedas emphasize and train on a vast variety of subjects.

While Buddhism adopted the moral precepts from Vedas, it made a blunder by ignoring the fuller picture. And that changed the path of history forever.

In fact Buddhism was not supposed to be a distinct sect in first place. It was merely supposed to be a philosophy focusing on moral aspects of life. Mahatma Buddha did not gave any preachings on other aspects at all. The blunder was that his followers took his narrow specific focus as a complete recipe of life.

Often we get so enamored by personalities that we lose the big picture. We consider fullness in whatever attracts our attention for long. For example, we witnessed the cricket drama for a month and now there seems nothing more patriotic than winning a World Cup and recommending Bharat Ratna for a cricketer! Similarly, most cults sprang up because the followers failed to consider the deeds and views of their role models as a critical PART of a bigger picture and instead considered completeness in that SMALL PART.

Mahatma Buddha considered eradication of misery as the Mission. While this is true, he took it to a narrow extreme and hence created a philosophy that was too pessimistic for common man to be motivated enough for worthwhile actions. This coupled with absence of any discussions on the key questions that initiate spiritual thinking – who am I, will I die forever, will this world end etc – left no incentive for a layman to extend his efforts beyond sitting in an isolated place trying to control the mind. Why would then one make sacrifice for nation, fight the enemies and work for smiles on face of his fellow-beings when he does not know clearly why he is doing so?

Today, psychologists would tell you that running away from miseries cannot bring the same level of motivation for worthwhile actions than desire for greater happiness.

Avoidance of miseries because world is full of miseries implies that one would naturally escape from worldly duties because even these performance of these duties would cause indulgence and hence miseries.

After all, Buddhist philosophy asserted that our misery began the moment we were born. To deny even the Self (Anatma) to become indifferent to pain becomes goal of life. How can then indifference generate actions when there is even no vaguely clear end-goal to be reached and denial is the best recipe?

Mahatma Buddha talked of 4 right beliefs: Knowledge of misery, Knowledge of origin of misery, Knowledge of cessation of misery and knowledge of path leading to cessation of misery.

But when even ‘I’ does not exist, who will work for getting these right beliefs? And what would be obtained? This incompleteness led to rank pessimism. The philosophies that emerged to counter this blinded belief system of Mahatma Buddha also suffered from the same pessimism and inherent inertia against vigorous actions.

Buddhism was doing bicep curls but not squatting sufficiently. It took only one part of Vedic message but ignored the rest.

Thus nationalism and reformist zeal could not co-exist prominently with Buddhism (even though Mahatma Buddha himself was an extremely dynamic man). It left Buddhism defenseless against savage attacks and created ‘Parable of Boiled Frog‘. If you put a frog in hot water, it would jump out immediately. But if you put it in a beaker and gradually increase the temperature of water from cold to warm to hot to boiling, the frog does not jump out. It dies instead. This is because the nervous system of frog is unable to detect gradual changes in temperature.

Lack of focus on proactive action plus view of life being a misery in either case – action or no action plus belief in everything being futile because everything is temporary plus refusal to look into bigger picture and focussing only on a narrow set of precepts, turned Buddhism into a frog. It offered little resistance to invaders and virtually opened the doors for savages to India.

And whatever Buddhism survived is far from original thoughts of the founder – a countless number of sects/ subsects with extremely diverse view and having only image of Gautam Buddha in common.

It is true that there is suffering in world. But to say that it is unalloyed pure suffering, with no iota of pleasure is a dangerous generalization. Absolute unalloyed pessimism cannot goad man to action. The world is not an abode of misery. The Benevolent God could not have made such a nasty world where suffering reigns. Even the most miserable in the world has some sort of joy which keeps him up. Even stoics had to summon up exceptional resolve when they prepared themselves for suicide. No sane being wishes to die because behind all miseries there is a hope that the all-blissful God will not leave us in lurch. Whether one believes in God or not, in this hope for a better future lies the bliss and acceptance of Supreme power. To deny this is to deny reality. And a philosophy that denies realism cannot face the challenges of real world.

Kapila states in Sankhya 5.113 that at least during Sushupti (deep slumber), Samadhi (deep meditation) and Moksha (Salvation) soul gets an experience of Supreme bliss.

Swami Dayanand succinctly explained the flaw in lines of Vedas: “If you compare the pleasure and pain of the world, pleasures many times exceed the pain. And many pure souls earn the bliss of salvation by constant practice of virtuous actions.”

(If Agniveer were to pick the most inspiring quote from entire Vedic teachings it has ever come across, it would undoubtedly be this one.)

This makes the Vedic philosophy distinctly optimistic and invigorating. It assuages the rigor of present life and makes the future hopeful. It illumines our present as well as future.

We wish if someone could have made this statement during times of Mahatma Buddha! History would have been different. But alas!

In absence of this, Buddhism turned to escapism (even though Mahatma Buddha himself was a man of action). When the savages attacked, we were occupied with our meditations to ignore the self and cause of misery through indifference. We neglected built up of strong armies, regular training, and R&D on defense. We were indifferent to need for reformist zeal to break the very roots of caste-system and gender discrimination, we refused to look into the Vedas to discover what the original teachings were. We were simply practicing indifference to real challenges around.

And today, while Buddhism does not prominently exist in India (except in Dharmashala where Dalai Lama is forced to have asylum after Chinese aggression), the philosophy and the myriad of other philosophies that emerged to amend or counter it, turns us into a fatalistic society. We have developed high inertia, resist the urge to face challenges, attempt to use philosophy as a tool to justify our escapism and have gradually moved towards becoming indifferent to whatever does not pinch us too strongly. Ahimsa has become just an alibi for laziness and cowardice.


No, we don’t mean that Buddhism is to be blamed for all this. Not at all. Buddhism was a natural reaction to the prevailing ironies in the society of those times. And an essential one. We believe that people have different needs and level of evolution and hence for many including Mahatma Buddha this was the most optimal view of life. For a society that was focusing too much on blind rituals and irrational social practices, Buddhism gave the right shock to spur up more rational and logical thinking. The roots of the problem lay much earlier and Buddhism was merely a logical and necessary outcome.

Teachings of Mahatma Buddha are based purely on moral aspects of Vedas. His teachings also showcase his respect for Vedas. His vocabulary and usages were derived from Vedic texts. Thus he was in summary a Vedic preacher to best of his abilities.

Thus there is NO WAY that Buddhism of Gautam Buddha can be termed as separate from Vedic Dharma. It is as much an offshoot attempting to reach the source – Vedic wisdom – as other sects.

However the defection of the narrow incomplete focus of Buddhism into a complete philosophy in its own right (which it never meant to be in first place) was detrimental to national interests.

Had Buddhism been a more informed and complete philosophy based on a more thorough and rigorous study of Vedas instead of its paradoxical apparent rejection based on extremely superficial grounds, history would have been different.

Had Buddhists spent efforts to reform the society the way Raja Ram Mohun Roy and Swami Dayanand attempted, instead of attempting to split into a separate sect (which it never was), history would have been different.

Similarly, if all other sects and cults would have not been based on bounded rationality of a few well-intentioned men and had instead attempted to grab the complete picture of the concepts in their original source, the Vedas, world would have been a much more sensible place today. Much more tolerant, broader in outlook and rational.

Whatever good that we see in any cult or sect is already existing in Vedas though elaborated through works and teachings of great legends from time to time. However because most of these founders were addressing their imminent short-term needs and the followers believed in exclusivity of their sect, the holistic view got missing.

The key lesson is that any incomplete or temporary solution for today would eventually become a problem tomorrow.

The only way is to adopt the complete solution.

Swami Dayanand suggested a way to approach this issue of so many sects and cults and religions touching one part of the elephant each. Let all the common points in all these sects be brought together that are acceptable to all. For example, non-violence, morality, nationalism, truthfulness, non-stealing etc. Then eliminate all assumptions, beliefs and practices unique to each sect that is not otherwise explainable. This becomes the Universal Dharma for all human beings and this is exactly what Vedas teach.

Agniveer respects all the great men of history who attempted to bring society closer to Vedic living. And aspires that we evolve to reach the original source that all these great legends were attempting to reach – The wisdom of Vedas. Instead of viewing completeness in our own silo, let us attempt to integrate all the silos together into One. Lets get back to the roots instead of holding on to each tiny branch as the source. No we don’t mean that all branches be cut-off and only root of the tree should remain. We only desire that each branch knows that we form a tree only when all the branches are together and supported by the root. A branch detached from rest of the branches and root would only be a dry piece of wood. So lets all be One Tree and strengthen the roots of the Tree that would then strengthen us all.

This is the only way to pay our homage to their legacy. Our failure to do so brought us the miseries we faced till today.

Our success would ensure Shantih (peace, bliss, happiness) everywhere.

ॐ द्यौ: शान्तिरन्तरिक्षँ शान्ति:

पृथिवी शान्तिराप: शान्तिरोषधय: शान्ति: ।

वनस्पतय: शान्तिर्विश्वे देवा: शान्तिर्ब्रह्म शान्ति:

सर्वँ शान्ति: शान्तिरेव शान्ति: सा मा शान्तिरेधि ॥

ॐ शान्ति: शान्ति: शान्ति: ॥

References: Works of Pt Gangaprasad Updhyaya, Pt Bhagvadutta, Justice Gangaprasad, Pt Dharmadeva Vidyamartanda and several other scholars

Note: The views expressed are supposed to be a  perspective to stir up thoughts, discussions and introspection. They may be viewed in context of the Agniveer’s stand and not otherwise.

Islamic supremacists desecrate Kaliagunj Temple with Beef

Islamic supremacists desecrate Kaliagunj Temple with Beef: "

Hindus get distressed

Hindus are under attack and unless they get strength and unity, there is no hope at all. Presence of beef in the village temple of Buri BasaliDevi in Kaliagunj proves the same necessity yet again.

But the novel consciousness among Hindus and their increasing aptitude to discern true friends is indeed a commendable development. Each and every Hindu, especially in areas under attack, must learn from this.

To Read Full Report Please Visit:



Can’t Godse be venerated? Who says!!

Can’t Godse be venerated? Who says!!: "

Nathuram Vinayak Godse, unlike his portrayals by Indian governance as a roughneck, was an individual who dedicated his own life for the country’s betterment. Even if it was the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi and ending to his own aspirations, none could deter him.

Approaches to find out the reality behind Mahatma’s death and reasons for which Godse became a martyr must be known to all. In the age of overflow of information through internet nothing can be hidden and people can’t be put to darkness.

To Read Full Report Please Visit:



Frenzied Muslims make brutal attacks on Hindus in Asansol to stop temple construction

Frenzied Muslims make brutal attacks on Hindus in Asansol to stop temple construction: "

Construction of temples has been the greatest aspect of Hindus, despite Islamic assaults and wrath of alleged secularists. But it has come under threat in Bengal and the fresh incident in Asansol, depicting Muslims’ frantic bid to stop temple construction, is the best revelation of Islamic fundamentalism hitherto.

The attack was a part of slanderous campaigns of Muslims (for years) to take over a land containing temple, known as mainstay of local Hindu population, in the vicinity.

To know more please read:



भारतीय समाज और गाय

भारतीय समाज और गाय: "
सौरभ मालवीय

मानवता ने जब भी चेतना को प्राप्त किया तो उसने सर्व शक्ति सम्पन्न को मातृ रूपेण ही देखा है। इसी कारण भारत में ऋषियों ने गऊ माता, गंगा माता, गीता माता, गायत्री माता और धरती माता को समान रूपेण्ा प्रथम पूज्यनीय घोषित किया है। इन पंचमातृकाओं में गाय ही सर्वश्रेष्ठ है और सबकी केन्द्रीय भू-शक्ति है। पौराणिक कथानुसार जब-जब धरती पर विपत्ति आती है तो यह धरणी गाय का भी स्वरूप धारण करती है। परमपिता परमेश्वर के बाद अपनी विपत्ति के निवारण के लिए गाय माता की ही पूजन अर्चन किया जाता है। भारतीय समाज में यह विश्वास है कि गाय देवत्व और प्रकृति की प्रतिनिधि है इसलिये इसकी रक्षा और पूजन कार्य श्रेष्ठ माना जाता है। सर्व शक्तिमान परमात्मा अपने अन्यान्य शक्तियों के साथ इस धरती पर प्रकट होते हैं। परम पूज्यनीय गोस्वामी तुलसी दास जी महाराज लिखते हैं -

”बिप्र धेनु सूर संत हित, लिन्ह मनुज अवतार।

निज इच्छा निर्मित तनु माया गुन गोपार॥

अर्थात ब्राम्हण (प्रबुध्द जन) धेनु (गाय) सूर(देवता) संत (सभ्य लोग) इनके लिए ही परमात्मा अवतरीत होते हैं। वह परमात्मा स्वयं के इच्छा से निर्मित होते हैं और मायातीत, गुणातीत एवम् इन्द्रीयातीत इसमें गाय तत्व इतना महत्वपूर्ण हैं कि वह सबका आश्रय है। गाय में 33 कोटि देवी देवताओं का वास रहता है। इस लिए गाय का प्रत्येक अंग पूज्यनीय माना जाता है। गो सेवा करने से एक साथ 33 करोड़ देवता प्रसन्न होते है। गाय सरलता शुध्दता और सात्विकता की मूर्ति है। गऊ माता की पीट में ब्रह्म, गले में विष्णु और मुख में रूद्र निवास करते है, मध्य भाग में सभी देवगण और रोम-रोम में सभी महार्षि बसते है। सभी दानों में गो दान सर्वधिक महत्वपूर्ण माना जाता है।

गाय को भारतीय मनीषा में माता केवल इसीलिए नहीं कहा कि हम उसका दूध पीते हैं। मां इसलिए भी नहीं कहा कि उसके बछड़े हमारे लिए कृषि कार्य में श्रेष्ठ रहते है। अपितु हमने माँ इस लिए कहा है कि गाय की ऑंख का वात्सल्य सृष्टि के सभी प्राणियों की आंखो से अधिक आकर्षक होता है अब तो मनोवैज्ञानिक भी इस गाय की आंखों और उसके वात्सल्य संवेदनाओं की महत्ता स्वीकारने लगे हैं। ऋषियों का ऐसा मनतव्य है कि गाय की आंखों में प्रीति पूर्ण ढंग से ऑंख डालकर देखने से सहज ध्यान फलित होता है। श्रीकृष्ण भगवान को भगवान बनाने में सर्वाधिक महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका गायों की ही थी। स्वयं ऋषियों का यह अनुभव है कि गाय की संगती में रहने से तितिक्षा की प्राप्ति होती है। गाय तितिक्षा की मूर्ति होती है। इसी कारण गाय को धर्म की जननी कहते हैं। उपयोगिता के आधार पर गाय से ज्यादा उपयोगी प्राणी घोड़ा रहा है और घोड़ों के ही कारण बड़ी-बड़ी राज सत्ताएं बनती या बिगड़ती रही है। ऐसा एक भी प्रमाण संसार में नहीं मिलेगा कि गायों के कारण कोई साम्राज्य बना है।

दूध के दृष्टि से भी भैंस, बकरी और ऊंट के महत्व को कम करके नहीं आंका जा सकता लेकिन इन सारी बातों के बावजूद घोड़ा, हाथी, खच्चर, ऊंट और बकरी एवं भैंस भारतीय चेतना में गाय के पासंग में भी नहीं टिकते और केवल भारत के ही नहीं अपितु पूरे विश्व में भी गाय की महत्ता स्वीकारी गई है। प्राचीनतम काल में निर्मित मिश्र के पीरामिडों पर बछड़ों को दूध पिलाते गाय का चित्र अंकित है। संसार में दूग्ध उत्पादन के लिए महत्वपूर्ण देश डेनमार्क समूल नाम धेनुमार्क था। भाषा विज्ञानियों के मतानुसार यह धेनुमार्क ही तद्भव होकर डेनमार्क बन गया।

अठारहवीं शताब्दी में प्रकाशित एक मानचित्र में डेनमार्क की राजधानी कोपेन हेगेन की स्पेलिंग ब्वूचमद भ्महमद लिखा गया है। बैलों के एक बड़े व्यापारी फोर्ड ने 12वीं शताब्दी ब्रिटेन में एक बड़ा मेला प्रारंभ किया उसी के नाम पर उस स्थान का नाम आस्फोर्ड हो गया। न्यूजीलैण्ड की एक वनवासी जाती मावरी भाषा बोलती है उन जनजातियों में गाय की पूजा की जाती है। गाय को मावरी में ”आक” कहते हैं। इसी आक के आधार पर न्यूजीलैण्ड की राजधानी का नाम आकलैण्ड पड़ा। इस प्रकार गाय की महिमा पूरे धरती पर गायी जाती है और गाय मानव जीवन में अत्यन्त उपयोगी है, गाय का दुध अमतृ के समान है इससे प्राप्त दूध, घी, मख्खन मनुष्य शरीर को पुष्ट (बलवान) बनाता है। गाय के मूत्र से विभिन्न प्रकार की दवाइयां बनाई जाती हैं, इसके मूत्र में कैंसर, टी.वी. जैसे गंभीर रोगो से लड़ने की क्षमता होती है और पेट के सभी विकार दूर होते हैं। गाय ही एक मात्र ऐसी प्राणी है जो ऑक्सीजन ग्रहण्ा करती है और ऑक्सीजन ही छोड़ती है। गाय के मूत्र में पोटेशियम, सोडियम, नाइट्रोजन, यूरिया और यूरिक एसिट होता है। दूध देते समय गाय के मूत्र में लेक्टोज की वृद्वि होती है जो हृदय रोगों के लिए लाभकारी है। गाय के समीप जाने से ही संक्रामक रोग कफ सर्दी, खांसी, जुकाम का नाश हो जाता है। गौमूत्र का एक पाव नित्य प्रात: खाली पेट सेवन करने से कैंसर जैसा रोग भी नष्ट हो जाता है। गाय की उपस्थिति का पर्यावरण के लिए एक महत्वपूर्ण योगदान है।

परन्तु दुर्भाग्य है हम लोंगों का भारत जैसे पवित्र देश में गोमांस अब एक महत्वपूर्ण व्यापार बन गया है। स्थिति की भयंकरता का अनुमान स्वयं लगा सकते है कि देश के 37 हजार आधुनिक कत्लखानों में 28 सौ गायें प्रति मिनट कटती है। जहाँ 1991 में प्रति दो भारतीय पर एक गोवंश था। अब वह 2001 में प्रति दस भारतीय पर एक गाय बची है। 1991 से 1996 तक 27 आधुनिक कत्तल खाने खोलने के लिए 75 प्रतिशत तक की सरकारी छूट दी गई। सन 1981 तक पूरे भारत का गोमांस निर्यात 39 हजार टन वार्षिक था। अब यह बढ़कर लगभग 5 लाख टन वार्षिक हो गया है। देश की सेकुलर नीति के कारण श्रीकृष्ण, नंदकिशोर गोपाल के इस देश में आज तक समग्र रूपेण्ा गोवध बन्दी का कानून नहीं बनाया जा सका और वोट बैंक की राजनीति के दुष्चक्र में राजस्थान और पश्चिम बंगाल की सीमा गायों की तस्करी का सबसे बड़ा केन्द्र बन गया। अब गो भक्त जनता का आग्रह इतना तीव्र होना चाहिए कि गाय की हत्या मनुष्य की हत्या जैसा मानकर के कानून बनाया जाय अन्यथा यह भारत विपत्ति के ऐसे जाल में फसता जा रहा है जहां से निकलने का कोई उपाय नहीं है। यदि भारत में गाय नहीं बची तो भारत का विनाश भी नहीं रोका जा सकता है।


Didi begins her games

Didi begins her games: "BJP hits out at Mamata’s madrasas move KOLKATA: The West Bengal unit of the BJP on Saturday criticised Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s decision to recognise 10,000 madrasas despite reports that Central intelligence had found most of the madrasas, operating along … Continue reading "

Islamic and European slavery: a very brief comparison

Islamic and European slavery: a very brief comparison: "Even the most conservative figures show that the “Islamic powers” over their history (632 AD to present, approx 1380 years) have enslaved at the very least 66% more people than the Christian West over it's history (approx 2000 years)."

‘Allah’ pig mortifies Muslims

‘Allah’ pig mortifies Muslims: "Islamic scientists have proved that the pig is the most shameless animal on the face of the earth. Islamic expert Zakir Naik has rightly pointed out that ‘it is the only animal that invites its friends to have sex with its mate’.

Naik also said that in America, most people consume pork. Many times after dance parties, they have swapping of wives; ie many say ‘you sleep with my wife and I will sleep with your wife’. If you eat pigs then you behave like pigs.’ Naik is a world authority on such matters, and I believe every word he says."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "One thing that I have seen in Indians - whether those in leadership positions such as diplomats, bureaucrats, industry leaders or those who have less important positions but interact with white people, is the refusal to face to the reality of racist feelings amongst white people.

While they no more engage in overt forms of apartheid, their desire for upper hand over 'lesser', colored people is profound. If the colored people they interact with have weaker position, they relish the contempt they can feel. If, as increasingly is the case with China, they cannot any more show contempt with authenticity, it is visceral hatred.

We should face upto this reality and drop all the glib nonsense about US and India being 'fellow' democracies. To them we, or any other people this side of Suez will never be equal.

Not only will they feel either contempt or hatred but will also act to ensure that they have upper hand over us in some way or the other. Some norm of interaction and engagement that puts them as superiors, some unequality in any form howsoever indirect.

It is really time our policies start taking cognisance of this. We should conduct our political and diplomatic affairs as if they did not exist. And then, when they demand we take cognisance of their 'strategic needs', we should deal in strictly transactional manner.

For long term, a few people around the world will be our allies and we should focus on them - non-Taliban Afghans, Tibetans, Myannmarese and such like. We should strengthen them and ensure their 'all weather' support.


Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone

इंडियन नेवी का मुक्ति संग्राम और भारत की स्वतंत्रता

इंडियन नेवी का मुक्ति संग्राम और भारत की स्वतंत्रता: "
नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस व आजाद हिन्द फौज द्वार भारत की स्वतंत्रता के लिए शुरू किये गये सशस्त्र संघर्ष से प्रेरित होकर रॉयल इंडियन नेवी के भारतीय सैनिकों ने 18 फरवरी 1946 को एचआईएमएस तलवार नाम के जहाज से मुम्बई में अंग्रेजी सरकार के विरूद्ध मुक्ति संग्राम का उद्घोष कर दिया था । उनके क्रान्तिकारी मुक्ति संग्राम ने भारतीय स्वतंत्रता संग्राम को एक नई दिशा प्रदान की ।
नौसैनिकों का यह मुक्ति संग्राम इतना तीव्र था कि शीघ्र ही यह मुम्बई से चेन्नई , कोलकात्ता , रंगून और कराँची तक फैल गया । महानगर , नगर और गाँवों में अंग्रेज अधिकारियों पर आक्रमण किये जाने लगे तथा कुछ अंग्रेज अधिकारियों को मार दिया गया । उनके घरों पर धावा बोला गया तथा धर्मान्तरण व राष्ट्रीय एकता विखण्डित करने के केन्द्र बने उनके पूजा स्थलों को नष्ट किये जाने लगा । स्थान - स्थान पर मुक्ति सैनिकों की अंग्रेज सैनिकों के साथ मुठभेड होने लगी । ऐसे समय में भारतीय नेताओं ने मातृभूमि की स्वतंत्रता के लिए लड रहे उन वीर सैनिकों का कोई साथ नहीं दिया , जबकि देश की आम जनता ने उन सैनिकों को पूरा सहयोग दिया । क्रान्तिकारी नौसैनिकों के नेतृत्वकर्ता ' श्री बी. सी. दत्त ' ने खेद प्रकट किया कि उनकों प्रोत्साहन और समर्थन देने के लिए कोई राष्ट्रीय नेता उनके पास नहीं आया , राष्ट्रीय नेता केवल अंग्रेजों के साथ लम्बी वार्ता करने में तथा सत्रों व बैठकों के आयोजन में विश्वास रखते है । उनसे क्रान्तिकारी कार्यवाही की कोई भी आशा नहीं की जा सकती ।
नौसैनिकों के मुक्ति संग्राम की मौहम्मद अली जिन्ना ने निन्दा की थी व जवाहरलाल नेहरू ने अपने को नौसैनिक मुक्ति संग्राम से अलग कर लिया था । मोहनदास जी गांधी जो उस समय पुणे में थे तथा जिन्हें इंडियन नेवी के मुक्ति संग्राम से हिंसा की गंध आती थी , उन्होंने नेवी के सैनिकों के समर्थन में एक शब्द भी नहीं बोला , अपितु इसके विपरीत उन्होंने वक्तव्य दे डाला कि -
' यदि नेवी के सैनिक असन्तुष्ठ थे तो वे त्यागपत्र दे सकते थे । '
क्या अपने देश की स्वतंत्रता के लिए उनका मुक्ति संग्राम करना बुरा था ? जो लोग देश की स्वतंत्रता के लिए अपने प्राणों पर खेलते थे , जो लोग कोल्हू में बैल की तरह जोते गये , नंगी पीठ पर कोडे खाए , भारत माता की जय का उद्घोष करते हुए फाँसी के फंदे पर झुल गये क्या इसमें उनका अपना कोई निजी स्वार्थ था ?
इंडियन नेवी के क्षुब्ध सैनिकों ने राष्ट्रीय नेताओं के प्रति अपना क्रोध प्रकट करते हुए कहा कि -
' हमने रॉयल इंडियन नेवी को राष्ट्रीय नेवी में परिवर्तित पर दिया है , किन्तु हमारे राष्ट्रीय नेता इसे स्वीकार करने को तैयार नही है । इसलिए हम स्वयं को कुण्ठित और अपमानित अनुभव कर रहे है । हमारे राष्ट्रीय नेताओं की नकारात्मक प्रतिक्रिया ने हमको अंग्रेज नेवी अधिकारियों से अधिक धक्का पहुँचाया है । '
भारतीय राष्ट्रीय नेताओं के विश्वासघात के कारण नौसैनिको का मुक्ति संग्राम हालाँकि कुचल दिया गया , लेकिन इसने ब्रिटिस साम्राज्य की जडे हिला दी और अंग्रेजों के दिलों को भय से भर दिया । अंग्रेजों को ज्ञात हो गया कि केवल गोरे सैनिको के भरोसे भारत पर राज नहीं किया किया जा सकता , भारतीय सैनिक कभी भी क्रान्ति का शंखनाद कर 1857 का स्वतंत्रता समर दोहरा सकते है और इस बार सशस्त्र क्रान्ति हुई तो उनमें से एक भी जिन्दा नहीं बचेगा , अतः अब भारत को छोडकर वापिस जाने में ही उनकी भलाई है ।
तत्कालीन ब्रिटिस हाई कमिश्नर जॉन फ्रोमैन का मत था कि 1946 में रॉयल इंडियन नेवी के विद्रोह ( मुक्ति संग्राम ) के पश्चात भारत की स्वतंत्रता सुनिश्चित हो गई थी । 1947 में ब्रिटिस प्रधानमंत्री लार्ड एटली ने भारत की स्वतंत्रता विधेयक पर चर्चा के दौरान टोरी दल के आलोचकों को उत्तर देते हुए हाउस ऑफ कॉमन्स में कहा था कि -
' हमने भारत को इसलिए छोडा , क्योंकि हम भारत में ज्वालामुखी के मुहाने पर बैठे थे । '
( दि महात्मा एण्ड नेता जी , पृष्ठ - 125 , लेखक - प्रोफेसर समर गुहा )
नेताजी सुभाष से प्रेरणाप्राप्त इंडियन नेवी के वे क्रान्तिकारी सैनिक ही थे जिन्होंने भारत में अंग्रजों के विनाश के लिए ज्वालामुखी का निर्माण किया था । इसका स्पष्ट प्रमाण ब्रिटिस प्रधानमंत्री ' लार्ड ' एटली और कोलकात्ता उच्च न्यायालय के पूर्व मुख्य न्यायाधीश ' पी. बी. चक्रवर्ती ' जो उस समय पश्चिम बंगाल के कार्यवाहक राज्यपाल भी थे के वार्तालाप से मिलता है । जब चक्रवर्ती ने एटली से सीधे - सीधे पूछा कि ' गांधी का अंग्रेजों भारत छोडो आन्दोलन तो 1947 से बहुत पहले ही मुरझा चुका था तथा उस समय भारतीय स्थिति में ऐसा कुछ भी नहीं था जिससे अंग्रेजों को भारत छोडना आवश्यक हो जाए , तब आपने ऐसा क्यों किया ? '
तब एटली ने उत्तर देते हुए कई कारणों का उल्लेख किया , जिनमें सबसे अधिक महत्वपूर्ण कारण ' इंडियन नेवी का विद्रोह ( मुक्ति संग्राम ) व नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस के कार्यकलाप थे जिसने भारत की जल सेना , थल सेना और वायु सेना के अंग्रेजों के प्रति लगाव को लगभग समाप्त करके उनकों अंग्रेजों के ही विरूद्ध लडने के लिए प्रेरित कर दिया था । ' अन्त में जब चक्रवर्ती ने एटली से अंग्रेजों के भारत छोडने के निर्णय पर गांधी जी के कार्यकलाप से पडने वाले प्रभाव के बारे मेँ पूछा तो इस प्रश्न को सुनकर एटली हंसने लगा और हंसते हुए कहा कि ' गांधी जी का प्रभाव तो न्यूनतम् ही रहा । '
एटली और चक्रवर्ती का वार्तालाप निम्नलिखित तीन पुस्तकों में मिलता है -
1. हिस्ट्री ऑफ इंडियन इन्डिपेन्डेन्ट्स वाल्यूम - 3 , लेखक - डॉ. आर. सी. मजूमदार ।
2. हिस्ट्री ऑफ इंडियन नेशनल कांग्रेस , लेखिका - गिरिजा के. मुखर्जी ।
3. दि महात्मा एण्ड नेता जी , लेखक - प्रोफेसर समर गुहा ।
- विश्वजीतसिंह

गौहत्या पर प्रतिबंध के खिलाप गांधी - नेहरू परिवार

गौहत्या पर प्रतिबंध के खिलाप गांधी - नेहरू परिवार: "
मोहनदास कर्मचन्द गांधी जी कहा करते थे कि गौरक्षा करने से मोक्ष मिलता हैं । सन 1921 में गोपाष्टमी के अवसर पर पटौदी हाउस में एक सभा के अन्दर , जिसमें हकीम अजमल खान , डॉ. अन्सारी , लाला लाजपतराय , पं. मदन मोहन मालवीय आदि उपस्थित थे , तभी इन सभी लोगों के समझ एक प्रस्ताव पास कराया गया कि -
' गौहत्या को अंग्रेजी सरकार कानूनी दृष्टि से बन्द करे , नहीँ तो देशव्यापी असहयोग आन्दोलन आरम्भ किया जायेगा । '
इसके बाद कांग्रेस के कार्यक्रमों में ' गौरक्षा ' सम्मेलनों का आयोजन होने लगा । ( आर्गनाइजर 26 फरवरी 1995 द्वारा रमाशंकर अग्निहोत्री )
परन्तु गांधी जी ने यह पाखण्ड केवल हिन्दुओं को अपना अनुयायी बनाने के लिए किया था ।
15 अगस्त 1947 को भारत के आजाद होने पर देश के कोने - कोने से लाखों पत्र और तार प्रायः सभी जागरूक व्यक्तियों तथा सार्वजनिक संस्थाओं द्वारा भारतीय संविधान परिषद के अध्यक्ष डॉ. राजेन्द्र प्रसाद के माध्यम से गांधी जी को भेजे गये जिसमें उन्होंने मांग की थी कि अब देश स्वतन्त्र हो गया हैं अतः गौहत्या को बन्द करा दो । तब गांधी जी ने कहा कि -
' राजेन्द्र बाबू ने मुझको बताया कि उनके यहाँ करीब 50 हजार पोस्ट कार्ड , 25 - 30 हजार पत्र और कई हजार तार आ गये हैं । हिन्दुस्तान में गौ - हत्या रोकने का कोई कानून बन ही नहीं सकता । इसका मतलब तो जो हिन्दू नहीं हैं , उनके साथ जबरदस्ती करना होगा . . . . . . जो आदमी अपने आप गौकुशी नहीं रोकना चाहते , उनके साथ मैं कैसे जबरदस्ती करूँ कि वह ऐसा करें । इसलिए मैं तो यह कहूँगा कि तार और पत्र भेजने का सिलसिला बन्द होना चाहिये इतना पैसा इन पर फैंक देना मुनासिब नहीं हैं । मैं तो अपनी मार्फत सारे हिन्दुस्तान को यह सुनाना चाहता हूँ कि वे सब तार और पत्र भेजना बन्द कर दें । भारतीय यूनियन कांग्रेस में मुसलमान , ईसाई आदि सभी लोग रहते हैं । अतः मैं तो यही सलाह दूँगा कि विधान - परिषद् पर इसके लिये जोर न डाला जाये । ' ( पुस्तक - ' धर्मपालन ' भाग - दो , प्रकाशक - सस्ता साहित्य मंडल , नई दिल्ली , पृष्ठ - 135 )
गौहत्या पर कानूनी प्रतिबन्ध को अनुचित बताते हुए इसी आशय के विचार गांधी जी ने प्रार्थना सभा में दिये -
' हिन्दुस्तान में गौ-हत्या रोकने का कोई कानून बन ही नहीं सकता । इसका मतलब तो जो हिन्दू नहीं हैं उनके साथ जबरदस्ती करना होगा । ' - ' प्रार्थना सभा ' ( 25 जुलाई 1947 )
हिन्दुस्तान ( 26 जुलाई 1947 ) , हरिजन एवं हरिजन सेवक ( 26 जुलाई 1947 )
अपनी 4 नवम्बर 1947 की प्रार्थना सभा में गांधी जी ने फिर कहा कि -
' भारत कोई हिन्दू धार्मिक राज्य नहीं हैं , इसलिए हिन्दुओं के धर्म को दूसरों पर जबरदस्ती नहीं थोपा जा सकता । मैं गौ सेवा में पूरा विश्वास रखता हूँ , परन्तु उसे कानून द्वारा बन्द नहीं किया जा सकता । '
( दिल्ली डायरी , पृष्ठ 134 से 140 तक )
इससे स्पष्ट हैं कि गांधी जी की गौरक्षा के प्रति कोई आस्था नहीं थी । वह केवल हिन्दुओं की भावनाओं का शौषण करने के लिए बनावटी तौर पर ही गौरक्षा की बात किया करते थे , इसलिए उपयुक्त समय आने पर देश की सनातन आस्थाओं के साथ विश्वासघात कर गये ।
7 नवम्बर 1966 को गोपाष्टमी के दिन गौरक्षा से सम्बन्धित संस्थाओं ने संयुक्त रूप से संसद भवन के सामने एक विशाल प्रदर्शन का आयोजन किया जिसमें तत्कालीन सरकार से गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून बनाने की मांग की गई । इस प्रदर्शन में भारत के प्रत्येक राज्य से करीब 10 - 12 लाख गौभक्त नर - नारी , साधु - संत और छोटे - छोटे बालक - बालिकाएं भी गौमाता की हत्या बन्द कराने इस धर्मयुद्ध में आये थे ।
उस समय इंदिरा गांधी प्रधानमंत्री पद पर थी और गुलजारिलाल नन्दा गृहमंत्री थे । श्री नन्दा जी ने प्रधानमंत्री इंदिरा गांधी को परामर्श दिया कि इतनी बडी संख्या में देशभर के सर्व विचारों के जनता की मांग गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून स्वीकार करें । तब इंदिरा गांधी ने कठोरता से कहा ' गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून बनाने से मुसलमान और ईसाई समाज कांग्रेस से नाराज हो जायेंगे । गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून नहीं बन सकता । ' इंदिरा के न मानने पर गुलजारिलाल नन्दा ने अपने गृहमंत्री पद से त्यागपत्र दे दिया और गौभक्त भारतीयों के इतिहास में अमर हो गये ।
उधर इंदिरा गांधी ने प्रदर्शन खत्म कराने के लिए निहत्थे अहिंसक गौभक्तों प्रदर्शनकारियों पर गोली चलवा दी जिसमें अनेकों साधुओं व गौभक्तों की हत्याएँ हुई । इंदिरा गांधी ने यह नृशंश हत्याकाण्ड गौपाष्टमी के पर्व पर कराया था अतः विधि का विधान देखिये कि - इंदिरा गांधी की हत्या भी गौपाष्टमी को हुई थी , संजय गांधी की दुर्घटना में मृत्यु भी अष्टमी को हुई , राजीव गांधी की हत्या भी अष्टमी को हुई , गौहत्या के महापाप से गांधी - नेहरू परिवार का नाश हो गया ।
स्वतन्त्रता प्राप्ति के इतने दिन बाद भी राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून न बन पाना भारतीयों के लिए बडे ही दुःख और अपमान की बात हैं । हे परमात्मा , नेहरू के वंशजों और गांधी के अनुयायी इन राजनेताओं को सद्बुद्धि दो । भारत की प्राणाधार गौमाता की हत्या बन्दी का कानून सम्प्रदायवाद की भावना से उठकर शीघ्र बने यहीं प्रार्थना हैं ।
- विश्वजीतसिंह

Protest: Denigration of Hindu Saints by 'Orient Ceramics'

Protest: Denigration of Hindu Saints by 'Orient Ceramics': "Orient Ceramics, a tile company based in New Delhi issued an extremely derogatory Advertisement in Kochi edition of the Indian Express. It denigrates Hindu Saints in very cheap manner. All Hindus should protest lawfully against it."

HJS joins hunger strike to oppose demolition of a Cow-shed

HJS joins hunger strike to oppose demolition of a Cow-shed: "On 25th May, a ‘Gou-shala’ (Cow-shed) was demolished at Vishhakhapattanam; therefore, the Andhra Pradesh ‘Gou-shala’ Foundation held one-day hunger strike at Bhagyanagar in its protest. HJS alsp joined protests."

Hindu Sadhu dies after a 73-day fast to save Ganga

Hindu Sadhu dies after a 73-day fast to save Ganga: "Swami Nigamanand, who was fasting for seventy-three days in Haridwar against rising pollution in the holy Ganges, breathed his last just hours after H.H. Baba Ramdev broke his fast."

Here is proof for Gandhi family’s Swiss Bank funds: Now will “Radia-tainted corrupt Indian media dogs” bark at Sonia bitch?

Here is proof for Gandhi family’s Swiss Bank funds: Now will “Radia-tainted corrupt Indian media dogs” bark at Sonia bitch?: "

This is the link from the Swiss Magazine Schweizer Illustrierte >http://www.schweizer-illustrierte.ch/zeitschrift/500-millionen-der-schweiz-imeldas-faule-tricks#

See the picture of Rajiv Gandhi. It lists Rajiv Gandhi as a Swiss Bank account holder with amount to the tune of 2.5 billion dollars. Now you know why Sonia Gandhi is so hard on Baba Ramdev who is keen on getting back Indian money deposited in Swiss Bank. Sonia wants to keep India in the dark and eat the loot.

POSTSCRIPT: The Gandhi family has international thieves for company. That also includes Imelda Marcos who looted Philippines and Idi Amin, the dictator who looted Uganda. After Marcos and Amin, now it is time for Sonia to flee. The public anger is boiling and we won’t be quelled by violence. The below pic is the front page cover of that story.


Rein in Sonia Maino and align with the Hindus: An open letter to Pope Benedict & Opus Dei

Rein in Sonia Maino and align with the Hindus: An open letter to Pope Benedict & Opus Dei: "


His Holiness Pope & all esteemed Opus Dei members,

I am a Hindu pagan who has read the entire Bible and the Koran, besides of course Hindu scriptures. I am also aware that the Opus Dei remote controls Pope Benedict in the Vatican in a manner similar to Sonia Gandhi remote controlling Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

I am also aware about the well-oiled Opus Dei machinery which can even put the CIA to shame.

I am also aware of the fact that the Vatican is under the constant fear of getting circumcised with the Muslim army breathing down its neck near Kosovo.

I also understand that the Vatican is planning to evangelise India through Sonia Gandhi by brazenly brainwashing Indians and capturing their institutions. I also understand that the Opus Dei has taken over Indian media to enforce its thought control.

However, I wish to tell you that your plans might horribly backfire and you might get fucked from both sides.

Rein in Sonia and align with the Hindus. We have enough details about her Swiss Bank chicanery. (http://greathindu.com/2011/06/here-is-proof-for-gandhi-familys-swiss-bank-funds-now-what-do-the-congressmedia-alliance-have-to-say/).

Today, India is not a banana republic. It is filled with pragmatic discerning educated youths. They are not hate-spewing. They are intelligent enough to see through your bogus designs.

Remember the immortal Abraham Lincoln lines: You can fool some people some times but not all the people all the times.

I pray to Lord Narayana to save Vatican from Muslim invasions. May Lord Narayana give you the good sense to align with Hindus rather then cheat them. If Jesus Christ is the son of God, Lord Narayana is the God of Gods.

Yours truly,

Deepak Kamat."