!! समर्थ हिन्दु, समर्थ हिन्दुस्थान !!;........................!! समर्थ हिन्दुस्थान, समर्थ विश्व !!............................
All the posts on this blog are re-postings and post headings point towards the actual posts.
The fact-finding team along with another member Dr. K. Laxman (National Secretary BJP) visited Hyderabad on 7th April 2010 and came to a conclusion that the riots were undoubtedly preplanned attacks on Hindus by the Congress and MIM combine. The committee interacted with the victims and cross section of people including reporters, NGOs, public representatives of various political parties and senior police officials. The team felt that international terrorists organisations with the help of local outfits unlashed systematic violence against Hindus with the larger design to change the demography of the old city.
"One of the factors that has come to our notice is that there was an attempt to intimidate a section of people to vacate the properties with an objective to occupy or buy them at throw-away prices. This is reportedly one of the reasons for the flare up of riots in the old city area. This is also part of the larger design to effect a complete change in the demographic profile of the old city. Police and Government have been discriminatory. Instead of calling a spade a spade and booking cases on merits, the police are trying to balance the numbers which evidence discrimination. The way stones were pelted, the way people were stabbed point to hands of trained professionals", the report said.
TODAY INDIA HAS THOUSANDS OF “MEER JAAFER” WHO CAN SELL THEIR COUNTRY FOR THEIR PROFIT!
MEER JAAFER was the man responsible for brutal killing of 18000 Indian soldiers at fort William and SIRAJUDAULA (navab of Bengal 1757) with the help of ROBERT CLIVE (army chief of east India Company).
This instance happened in 1757 “WAR OF PLASI” between east India Company and king of Bengal . Sirajudaula, the king of Bengal knew that this company came to conquer India and not for business so he started to revolt.Meer Jaafer was army chief of Bengal, Jaafer betray his own king because of his urge to become king of Bengal .
WAR OF PLASI 23june, 1757 – 18000 Indian soldiers surrendered in front of
300 English soldiers in “40 MINUITES” only. Our 18000 soldiers were kept hungry for 10 days and killed on 11thday at fort William , Bengal .
If Meer Jaafer hadn’t betrayed sirajudaula we might not have lost our 6lacs freedom fighters!
Above text is available at INDIA HOUSE LIBERARY, London.This lib. Have 20000 documents related to Indian slavery.
one of the myths perpetuated by the Dawn article below and secularists in India is that V D Savarkar was amongst others the first to talk about the 2 nation theory. After the Mutiny of 1857 when the Muslims & Hindus fought the British together the Brits came down heavily on the Muslims. Starting 1860's Sir Syed Ahmed Khan founder of the Aligarh Muslim University and the Brits worked together hand in hand and laid the seeds of Muslims separatism. This was to culminate in the Creation of separate electorates for Muslims around 1906 and the Partition of Bengal in 1905. These decisions were meant to accentuate the Hindu Muslim divide. Please read Syed Ahmed's speeches and the role played by the Brits in an article titled 'Aligarh Muslim Movement and British role' on esamskriti link below. http://www.esamskriti.com/html/new_i...cid=412&sid=99, Find below two of his speeches that will give yu an idea of what I am saying.
1. At a speech at Meerut on 16/03/1888 Syed Ahmed refers to the Hindus and Muslims not only as two nations, but as two warring nations who could not lead a common political life if ever the Brits left India. He said, "Now suppose that all the Brits were to leave India, then who would be the rulers of India? Is it possible that under these circumstances these nations, the Muhammadan and the Hindu could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power. Most certainly not. It is necessary that one of them should conquer the other and thrust it down. To hope that both could remain equal is to desire the impossible and the inconceivable". Sachin Sen pg 42. Extract from History and Culture of the Indian People by the Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan.
2. Quoting from Indian Controversies by Arun Shourie pg 112 Syed Ahmed said "And first suppose that all the Muslims vote for a Muslim and all the Hindus vote for a Hindu, it is certain that Muslims will have four times as many votes since their population is four times as numerous. And then how can the Muslim guard his interests? Now I ask you, O Muslims! Weep at your condition! Have you such wealth that you can compete with the Hindus? In the whole nation there is no person who is equal to Hindus in the fitness for the work!" Will the Hindus stop criticizing themselves?
It should be worthwhile to examine these statements closely and put them to a test of facts.The first man to talk of Hindus and Muslims as separate nations was V.D. Savarkar who coined the word 'Hindutva' in a book with the same title in 1923. Other Hindu leaders who accepted the two-nation theory were Dr Moonje of the Hindu Mahasabha, Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya, founder of the Benares Hindu University, Lala Lajpat Rai, Bhai Parmanand and Swami Shraddhanand.
Eminent Bengali writer Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay also supported the notion."
Savarkar's untold story Interviews with Savarkar film-maker and his son By Anil Nair
Ved Rahi is a film-maker whose genre is uncommon. He made a full-length feature film on Savarkar without even the elementary financial backing of a producer. People from all over the country contributed with their small amounts of even Rs 100, which finally helped him make his dream project come true.
Mahatma Gandhi with Savarkar in the film Savarkar
>What about Savarkar countenancing the two-nation theory?
That is another bit of fiction that is doing the rounds. Savarkar?s poems which are so soul-wrenching dealt with nationalism and Akhand Bharat and he unequivocally rejected the two-nation theory. It is amusing to see that a person like Mahatma Gandhi who all his life swore that partition of the country will be over his dead body, finally gave in. But today politicians attribute the two-nation theory to people like Savarkar who were staunchly against it. Very funny.
Mr. Savarkar... insists that, although there are two nations in India, India shall not be divided into two parts, one for Muslims and the other for the Hindus; that the two nations shall dwell in one country and shall live under the mantle of one single constitution;... In the struggle for political power between the two nations the rule of the game which Mr. Savarkar prescribes is to be one man one vote, be the man Hindu or Muslim. In his scheme a Muslim is to have no advantage which a Hindu does not have. Minority is to be no justification for privilege and majority is to be no ground for penalty. The State will guarantee the Muslims any defined measure of political power in the form of Muslim religion and Muslim culture. But the State will not guarantee secured seats in the Legislature or in the Administration and, if such guarantee is insisted upon by the Muslims, such guaranteed quota is not to exceed their proportion to the general population.
Towards the end of the war, Savarkar and the Mahasabha became increasingly confrontational with the League and Muslim politicians. Hindu Mahasabha activists protested Gandhi's initiative to hold talks with Jinnah in 1944, which Savarkar denounced as "appeasement." He assailed the British proposals for transfer of power, attacking both the Congress and the British for making concessions to Muslim separatists. Soon after Independence, Dr Shyama Prasad Mookerjee resigned as Vice-President of the Hindu Mahasabha dissociating himself from its Akhand Hindustan plank, which implied undoing partition.
Author: Rakesh Sinha Publication: The Pioneer Date: March 27, 2002
The only subscriber of the pernicious Two-nation Theory, besides the All India Muslim League, was the Communist Party of India (CPI). No Hindu group supported or demanded Partition. When the constituent Assembly was discussing the future constitution and polity of the country, Hindu groups do not demand for a Hindu state. The manipulation and distortion of facts have always been the tools of ideological history to reproach adversaries keeping the present in the mind for any historical blunder. Indian historiography is barely free from such lapses on the part of "professional" historians. It is due to this, VD Savarkar or Dr Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, Hindu Mahasabha leaders, are equated with Mohammad Ali Jinnah and Liaquat Ali. In its political trajectory, at no point of time the Mahasabha, least to say the RSS, demanded Partition of the country.
Savarkar's work, Hindutva, indeed delineating that Hindus and Muslims are two different civilisations and cultures, should not and does not infer his advocacy for two nation theory. He also discussed racial and ancestral unity of both the communities. It should not be forgotten that he always emphasised common citizenship to the minorities in the independent India.
"Anti-Pakistan day" was a favourite programme of the HMS in 40s. Yet Marxist historians do not evaluate his philosophy in totality and only selective quotes have been used to equate him with Jinnah. Not only this, he is more hated personality in the secularist discourse than the founders of Pakistan.
Jinnah's two-nation theory is not only implicit in Savarkar's concept of 'Hindutva'; Savarkar also stated it explicitly. Speaking at the Hindu Mahasabha session at Ahmedabad in 1937 he said," India cannot be assumed to be an unitarian and homogenous nation, but on the contrary there are two nations in the main, the Hindus and the Muslims in India". Critics of Savarkar have gone so far as to call him the father of the two-nation theory! Comment.
The two-nation theory long antedated Savarkar's 1937 Hindu Mahasabha presidential speech. In 1930, Sir Muhammad Iqbal became Muslim League President and for the first time publicly demanded an independent, sovereign Muslim state. "I would like to see the Punjab, the North-West Frontier Province, Sindh and Baluchistan amalgamate into a single state. Self-government within the British Empire or without the British Empire, the formation of a consolidated North-West Indian Muslim State appears to me the final destiny of the Muslims at least of North-Western India," declared Iqbal. Indeed, the roots of Pakistan may be traced to Islamic theology that considers Muslims to be an ummah that is distinct and indeed at constant war with infidels. Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto bluntly wrote, .The starting point of Pakistan goes back a thousand years to when Muhammad-bin-Qasim set foot on the soil of Sind and introduced Islam in the sub-continent" (quoted in 'The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India', KS Lal, Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi, 1992, p 327). Savarkar was a keen student of Islam and being a hard realist, he merely stated the obvious.
Mahasabha President Veer Savarkar gave the above clarification when asked about the statement issued by some journalists in Nagpur. .You always say that in Hindusthan, Hindus are a nation and that the Mussalmans and others are communities. How does one reconcile this statement and the statement that there are two nations in Hindusthan?. When asked this question, Veer Savarkar replied, .I had clarified this in my Nagpur interview. But instead of reporting this, journalists simply reported that I accept the two-nation theory. This has resulted in the whole misunderstanding. I am surprised that a storm has been raised now on this issue. Because I have always been referring to the two-nation theory right from my Ahmedabad speech.
It is a historic truth that the Mussulmans are a .nation.. I had clarified the historical and racial background of this theory in Nagpur. Islam is a theocratic nation based on the Koran right from its inception. This nation never had geographical boundaries. Wherever the Mussulmans went, they went as a nation. They also came to Hindusthan as a .nation.. Wherever they go, Mussulmans shall either remain foreigners or rulers. As per the Koran, those who are not Mussulmans are kafirs, enemies of Islam. Even today, after praying in the mosque, Mussulmans ask for atonement for committing the sin of living in a kafir-ruled state. As per the principle of Mussulmans, the earth is divided into two nations . Dar-ul Islam (land of Islam) and Dar-ul Harb where Islam does not rule (enemy land). As per their religious command, their campaign on Hindusthan was as a separate nation.
Seizing the right opportunity and taking advantage of the Congress. policy of surrender, the Muslim League once again emphatically put forth that same old theory of the Mussulman nation being a separate nation. If one turns a blind eye to this reality, the Hindu Nation is bound to be divided. So we do not care if you consider yourself to be a separate nation. The effort towards Hindu consolidation is to emphatically state that the Hindu Nation is a self-evident and unified Nation. The Mahasabha came forward as a separate and mighty national organization of the Hindu Nation. Hindu Nationalism gave a cutting edge to the effort of consolidation.
To summarize, the Hindu Mahasabha under Savarkar occupied positions of power whenever possible not to enjoy power per se but to safeguard Hindu interests. It is noteworthy that Savarkar himself never occupied a position of power. If he had wished, he could have joined the Congress and led a cushy life. He chose to stand up to the dominant line of thinking in the country at the time and speak what was in the best interests of the Hindus.
Guru Govind Singh was one of Savarkar.s heroes. Savarkar was honoured at the Golden Temple (Hari Mandir) in Amritsar during his tour of Punjab.
गोत्र सिस्टम इसलिए बनाया गया, ताकि किसी शख्स के पूर्वजों का पता चल सके। जानकारों के मुताबिक हजारों साल पहले ऋषियों व मुनियों के यहां उनके तमाम शिष्य दीक्षा लेते थे। इनके बीच आपसी विवाह आदि वर्जित था। इनके वंशजों ने भी इस परंपरा को कायम रखा। ये शिष्य अलग-अलग जातियों के थे लेकिन इनके गोत्र का निर्धारण उनके गुरु के नाम के मुताबिक हुआ। परंपरागत मैरिज सिस्टम में एक गोत्र में शादी पर बैन है। अभी भी देश के कई इलाकों में एक गोत्र में शादी नहीं होती, लेकिन 1955 में हिंदू मैरिज ऐक्ट बना और सभी पुराने परंपरागत कानून बदल दिए गए।
नवगठित हिंदू तख्त के प्रमुख सेवादारों की ओर से कैलेंडर व पंचांग का विमोचन फव्वारा चौक स्थित दुर्गा भगवती मंदिर में किया गया। आतंकवाद के दौर में शहीद हुए जनरल एएस वैद्य, पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री बेअंत सिंह, बलदेव सिंह, शीतल सिंह, शंभू प्रसाद, रमेश प्रसाद भारद्वाज, रूलदा राम, रमाकांत जलोटा, अशोक कुमार, गोवर्धन दास, कुलदीप कुमार, अशोक कुमार सहित 15 अमर शहीदो के चित्र विशेष रूप से केलेडंर में प्रकाशित किए गए है।
हिंदू तख्त के मुख्य सेवादार राजीव टंडन व संजीव घई ने कैलेंडर संबंधी जानकारी देते हुए बताया कि पंजाब में कैलेंडर की दो लाख प्रतियों का निशुल्क वितरण किया जाएगा। उन्होंने कहा कि कैलेंडर जारी करने का मुख्य उद्देश्य नई पीढ़ी को संस्कारों व त्योहारों से परिचित करवाना है।
आगामी आयोजन की जानकारी देते हुए अमर टक्कर ने बताया कि हिंदू तख्त की ओर से 2 मई को पठानकोट में विशाल हिंदू सम्मेलन का आयोजन किया जाएगा। महामंडलेश्वर स्वामी 1008 संजीव हरि की अध्यक्षता वाले इस सम्मेलन में सनातन धर्म प्रचार सामग्री वितरित की जाएगी। इस अवसर पर राकेश कपूर, संजीव घई, मनोज भाटिया, दविंदर कुमार, तेलुराम व शरणजीत चाहल उपस्थित रहे।